Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates ![]() Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2025 at 08:41:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
Info created by Friviere – uploaded by Friviere – nominated by Friviere -- Paco ✉ 08:41, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Paco ✉ 08:41, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2025 at 05:37:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created by Plozessor – uploaded by Plozessor – nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 05:37, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 23:36:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Russia
Info Christmas morning view of church of the Exaltation of the Cross in Belogorsky Monastery, Perm Krai, Russia. Created & uploaded by Ted.ns – nominated by Екатерина Борисова -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Comment Quite nice mood but a bit large composition with too much snow maybe, and it needs perspective correction -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Comment It's angle view, because the cathedral (and the whole monastery, which is very small) stands on the top of the big hill (the place name, Belaya Gora, means White Mountain). -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:23, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 23:04:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Intentional camera movement (ICM)
Info Singers from Constantine (Algeria). Created by Khaled zerfaoui – nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 22:45:06
Info Not that this is a bad image, but there's now a JPG version, and JPG photos are superior to PNGs. JPG: (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- Anohthterwikipedian (talk) 22:45, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace --Thi (talk) 07:41, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Delist and replace --Yann (talk) 08:51, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 14:15:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Eclipse
Info We already have some great 'scientific' FPs of eclipses, total and partial (1 and 2), so I'm going to risk a more artistic photo of one.
Partial solar eclipse with some clouds on 29 March 2025, in Tuntorp, Brastad, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden. I had my mind set on a sort of sequence, but big clouds moving swiftly with the wind prevented that. I had do make do with photos taken when the clouds were favorable. This is taken with only a normal polarizing filter; I used the clouds as filters for the strong sunlight. Towards the end of the eclipse, like here, the clouds moved in layers so I could get one cloud to cover the sun and another one at lower altitude to make a nice framing. And in a few photos this also made some faint crepuscular rays; this is one of them. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 14:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 14:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 14:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support cool shot, gives a much better sense of what it's like actually to see an eclipse than current FPs Cmao20 (talk) 21:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 13:13:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Veneto
Info Punta Penia, the highest peak of the Dolomites. Created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support —kallerna (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Great light and certainly an angle of this peak we don't see very often, but it needs to be renamed, preferably after the nomination is over, to better describe what's in the photo. --Cart (talk) 13:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Amazing view Cmao20 (talk) 14:14, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 14:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:22, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:41, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:08, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:55, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 11:38:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#Alberta
Info Banff National Park is always a beautiful place for landscape photos. There are no FPs from this specific place so far. created by DXR – uploaded by DXR – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 11:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 11:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Very atmospheric, the sky and its reflection turn a beautiful landscape into an extraordinarily beautiful one. In my opinion, the slight image noise is tolerable. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 06:43:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Hautes-Alpes
Info Lake of Serre-Ponçon viewed from Rousset (Hautes-Alpes, France) created by Pline -- Pline (talk) 06:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Pline (talk) 06:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition! Cmao20 (talk) 11:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2025 at 22:15:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore
Info Night view of the Victoria Theatre, Singapore. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 22:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:41, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful and great quality Cmao20 (talk) 11:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:19, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Good memories. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:42, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:04, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2025 at 14:57:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Paridae_(Tits)
Info Tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 14:57, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:57, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:42, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 10:55, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Exemplary, lovely capture in good quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Cuteness overload. --Cart (talk) 13:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice light and background -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:42, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2025 at 11:17:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Salahuddinrazu – uploaded by Salahuddinrazu – nominated by Kaim Amin -- Kaim (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kaim (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Request Please add the {{PR}} template in all your uploads featuring people -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin,
Done. Thanks but a comment on this FPC would have been nice too. Kaim (talk) 13:05, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin,
- Everything in its own time :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Oppose It's a fun image, a great subject and good file decription, but with almost minimalistic composition like this you need to be careful about the details. I find the crop a bit too tight, the light glistening on the body paint is not ideal and that string for the garland around his neck should have been tucked in or removed since it distracts from the main subject. --Cart (talk) 13:53, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 14:50, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking red painting and red paper guirlands. Shallow DoF but the eyes are in focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:24, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2025 at 09:14:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Bharatanatyam is a classical Indian dance form originating from Tamil Nadu, with a history spanning over 2,000 years. In this photo live performance by Dr. Janaki Rangarajan, a celebrated Bharatanatyam dancer. All by-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:14, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:14, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Great pose, good capture and thank you for the very interesting description. --Cart (talk) 10:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:06, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:33, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:44, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 18:33, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:24, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:01, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 21:27:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity
Info created by Sebastian C. Adams, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support Not scientifically accurate, but still very original. -- Yann (talk) 21:27, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Huuuge size. It took me a while to open this 200 Mo file, but it's worth it. Impressive amount of data. Fiction mixed with reality. Diogenes the cynic "and his tub", "Noah's deluge"... Very good image quality. (Display this in a big way in a waiting room, and patients will stop being bored :-)) Among the many oddities of this document, there is at the end a huge list of "eminent men", but are there women too? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 21:13:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#France
Info Ceiling of the Panthéon, Paris, France. The edifice was built between 1758 and 1790, from designs by Jacques-Germain Soufflot, at the behest of King Louis XV of France. Some of the most important personalities in France's history are buried in its necropolis, among them, Voltaire, Rousseau, Victor Hugo or Louis Braille. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:26, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Appealing, exemplary symmetry. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:47, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:16, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:32, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Difficult light quite well handled here -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:23, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:00, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 15:06:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1800-1849
Info created by unknown photographer, restored and uploaded by Wcamp9 and Adam Cuerden, nominated by Yann
Support There was some issue in the previous version, now fixed. -- Yann (talk) 15:06, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:26, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Looks like he could be one of Dexter's ancestors. ;) Interesting photo (I like seeing the little special boxes for the photos that you needed back then) and good restauration. --Cart (talk) 10:18, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:53, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:23, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support but you really needn't credit me for helping put back a couple bits mistakenly edited out. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:39, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:06, 1 April 2025 (UTC))
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:55, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 11:20:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Germany
Info Instructive and typical view of a German landscape in the middle mountain range in spring: View from, Schwarzenfels Castle into the valley of the Schmale Sinn. At the bottom left is the south portal of the Landrücken Tunnel and an ICE train. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 11:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 11:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Huge resolution and detail, nice composition. Light is only okay but other factors outweigh that. Cmao20 (talk) 12:27, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, light is quite normal, but I think for the most WP-projects this is better than quite extraordinary light situation showing the scene in a nor representative way. Milseburg (talk) 12:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:49, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:28, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:22, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 18:29, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 09:32:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
Info created by Anitava Roy – uploaded by Anitava Roy – nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 09:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Atudu (talk) 09:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Very nice motif but unfortunately oversharpened in post-processing. With so many of good pictures, focus stacking would be the best solution.--Ermell (talk) 20:49, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I'm afraid taht Ermell is right, it's too shallow Poco a poco (talk) 21:15, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 07:13:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info The “'Paranza'“ boat displays the wooden statues of the Three Wise Men, part of the floating Nativity scene which boasts the recognition: “Heritage of Italy for tradition”, awarded by the italian Ministry of Tourism for “Its ability to keep alive the folklore and traditions of the territory...“. All by Terragio67. -- Terragio67 (talk) 07:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
-- Terragio67 (talk) 07:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Support
Neutral It's a pity the reflection is cut, with the whole mast there and less sky it would have been a spectacular photo. But I won't stand in the way if other people think this is adequate. --Cart (talk) 10:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oops, Yeah you're right, thanks, but this photo is still cute, so I preferred to add a valid alternative that could overcome your objections, even if partial. Thanks for your constructive criticism, as always. Terragio67 (talk) 14:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Per Cart. Nice colors and fine light, but the cropped reflection spoils the composition. --Milseburg (talk) 10:50, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment It might be beneficial to crop 1100–1200 pixels from the bottom (and the same amount of empty sky). This would minimize the already incomplete reflection. --Milseburg (talk) 13:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. Editing this photo is not possible, because the reflections of the subject collide with another boat next to me. I thought it would be better to upload a new alternative image from a different angle. Terragio67 (talk) 14:18, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- I'm really Sorry, I misunderstood your suggestion because I read it hastily. I liked the result proposed updating the image, thanks. Terragio67 (talk) 04:59, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful motif and colours for me, in spite of cut reflection Cmao20 (talk) 12:26, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Good light but cut out reflection. Note I prefer this angle of view than the alternative below -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:50, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Alternative new version
Info I decided to upload a new version according to the criticism above. It was photographed from a different angle where the boat reflections did not collide with other boats... Created, 2nd version uploaded, and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 14:11, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 14:14, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for showing this, but I think the angle and light is better in the first one. In this the reflection is too prominent. --Cart (talk) 10:27, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support I prefer this one because the reflection is not cut off. --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:32, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:48, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Weak support The other one is much better but this one is still okay for FP Cmao20 (talk) 13:17, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:21, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 18:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 06:16:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info Old woman of Algeria. Created by Fawzi Demmane– nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 06:16, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 06:16, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Well executed portrait with remarkable expression of the subject. Please, add the Personality rights in Summary section. ... -- Terragio67 (talk) 07:27, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 10:22, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:07, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Terragio67 Cmao20 (talk) 12:25, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 14:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support In my opinion, her gaze carries gentleness and lived wisdom, wrapped in quiet melancholy. The fine lines tell of love, loss, and hope. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:55, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 19:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 20:48, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice even if the eyes are unfortunately not quite sharp.--Ermell (talk) 20:53, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Terragio67 -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful portrait --Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:04, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 11:42, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:20, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:44, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 01:28:22
Info First of all, it's a black and white mangling of a sepia original, second, the sepia version says it's cropped from the original, and I don't know if it could be cropped better - the failure to get it at the time has meant link rot has lost us the chance - but it's a pretty bad crop. Absolutely no foot room. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:28, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Delist I'm not sure about the customs of the 2006 vote. It seemed to be only a question of which of the pictures would be FP, not whether any would be. I also think there isn't one. Possibly VI. --Milseburg (talk) 11:37, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Delist per nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 12:24, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Delist The standard for FP is way higher now. --Yann (talk) 14:15, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Delist The customs were different in 2006, but the original nomination is still a bad joke. Five people voted on the sepia version (4 pro, 1 contra). Then somebody (not the original nominator) jumped in and added the b&w version, saying they would support that one. No one of the previous voters commented on the b&w version. Then the votes were counted in a completely arbitrary manner, claiming that 5 voters supported the b&w version – well, we only know that a single voter supported it, the one who had added it … Even if this was the greatest photo ever, we cannot say that it has been promoted correctly. – Aristeas (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- I thought that looked odd, didn't realise it was THAT odd. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:55, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah I don't think this picture was ever validly promoted in the first place so it's almost a procedural delist really Cmao20 (talk) 12:05, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Delist Thanks to Aristeas for unravelling this case. --Cart (talk) 18:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Delist --Thi (talk) 20:58, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 11:42:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
Info The lake side of the Rheinsberg Palace. All by me --A.Savin 11:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 11:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Lovely reflections and lovely architecture Cmao20 (talk) 13:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:03, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Per aboveː Beautiful composition, denoising performed to the limit of perfection. -- Terragio67 (talk) 07:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Well done and an outstanding motif, but I think light is a bit too dull here for wowing. --Milseburg (talk) 10:47, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:06, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 20:44, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Neat mirror image of a special building -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 11:39:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
Info Interior with the three winged altars of the parish church Schönbach, Lower Austria. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Good evocation of a modest but lovely church Cmao20 (talk) 13:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:27, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Great shot in poor and difficult lighting conditions. -- Terragio67 (talk) 07:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:04, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 and Terragio67 – the nuanced reproduction of light and shadows reminds me of some masterly Dutch oil paintings. – Aristeas (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 07:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Occitanie
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Scenic and loads of details to explore at sharp full resolution Cmao20 (talk) 13:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 07:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 10:59, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:02, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:35, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 20:43, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:22, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 07:26:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Slovenia
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice! You somehow have given it the look of an ink drawing with watercolor rendering. --Cart (talk) 09:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support This is pretty great - unusual but effective composition, excellent light Cmao20 (talk) 13:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:17, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive. Looking at it reminds me a little of Canaletto's paintings. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:00, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:35, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Often this kind of twilight etc. doesn’t work well; but it did with this scenery, per Cart etc. – Aristeas (talk) 15:46, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Successful long-exposure shot and interesting buildings -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per above... -- Terragio67 (talk) 04:08, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 05:32:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Pinaceae
Info Delleboersterheide, nature reserve of the It Fryske Gea. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) on an overgrown heathland in mild evening light.
All by me -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 07:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:34, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support The curved track at the right, the pond at the left and the clouds frame and emphasize the pines and make the composition successful. - Aristeas (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:53, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 19:10, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 20:42, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:57, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas. --Terragio67 (talk) 04:12, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2025 at 02:59:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support A well balanced composition that highlights the striking blue windows as a focal point. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:51, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Bland building, but the 'Hopper-ish' composition makes it work. --Cart (talk) 09:47, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cart. Painterly. A study in cream and blue colours. Cmao20 (talk) 13:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 07:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:59, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:34, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cart and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 15:41, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition --Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:18, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cart & Radomianin. – Terragio67 (talk) 15:14, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Support I like combo of colors and architecture. I dont like PD edit, too much - making trapezoid out of rectangle and would put smaller Aperture, its not portrait. Anyway.--Mile (talk) 15:50, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 19:05:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
Info created, uploaded and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:05, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:05, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Nice architecture but the harsh midday light doesn't help to distinguish the roof and the ground floor -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review, I've tried to soften the light and reduce the shadows a little. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 08:24, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your efforts, but the snow is now grey. Sorry I find the previous version, with more vivid colors, better -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Performed another edit, tried to bring back brilliance in the snow without replicating the overexposed look of original. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 07:28, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your efforts, but the snow is now grey. Sorry I find the previous version, with more vivid colors, better -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support I know what Basile Morin means, the house is a little bit dark under the harsh light and blends into the background. Nevertheless I love it. Great choice to go for a square composition to focus on the house. It's a really interesting subject and I love how the angular and jagged roof looks like one of the mountain peaks. Cmao20 (talk) 13:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 --Kritzolina (talk) 07:49, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 15:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support by others--Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 17:14:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
Info created & uploaded by Dipu ME-12 – nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Very good moment but not sharp enough IMO. Sorry--Ermell (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Sorry but per Ermell, not really focussed properly and only 6 megapixels, hence not FP for me despite excellent moment and good composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 10:07:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves)
Info created & uploaded by Princepauljoy – nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 10:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 10:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 10:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment FP Gallery can be specify with Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves). ~Moheen (keep talking) 10:48, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but in my opinion oversharpened which I struggle to overlook at this relatively low resolution Cmao20 (talk) 12:25, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support though quality can be better I still like the subject. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 14:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Cmao20. Nice bird and compo but unfortunately the editing quality sinks it. --Cart (talk) 10:26, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
File:Common grackle in PP (36732).jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2025 at 00:27:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Icteridae_(Icterids)
Info Common grackle (Quiscalus quiscula), a kind of blackbird. I like that this shot captures some of its feathers' iridescence. Fun fact: a group of grackle sis called a "plague". :) all by — Rhododendrites talk | 00:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 00:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful bird and great compo with the helpful twig matching the shapes of the bird. --Cart (talk) 09:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:24, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:11, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:31, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:53, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cart. – Aristeas (talk) 15:12, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 19:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family : Laridae (Gulls, terns and skimmers)
Info created by Princepauljoy – uploaded by Princepauljoy – nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 19:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 19:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support It's a bit noisy but still a spectacular capture Cmao20 (talk) 12:23, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, too noisy and oversharpened for my taste. The scene itself though is fantastic. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:01, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Imho, the bokeh doesn't look entirely natural. Nevertheless, the scenery is magnificent, a fortunate moment to have captured in a photograph. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your valuable opinion.The picture was captured from padma rivrbad.Due to noise decreases,adding a bit cool tone and detail decreases it is looking like a bit more bokeh then the raw one. Princepauljoy (talk) 18:09, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for your kind and detailed explanation about the bokeh! I truly admire your dedication and the passion you put into your photography. Personally, I feel the image is slightly overprocessed, so I won't cast a support vote - but that doesn't change my appreciation for your beautiful work. Wishing you all the best, and please keep sharing your wonderful photos :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 19:07, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support I see the problems but still think the scene is special enough to call this one of our best --Kritzolina (talk) 07:50, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Spectacular scene, but the editing quality is simply too low for me. --Cart (talk) 10:29, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 05:34:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Others
Info oak-apple still attached to an oak leaf, sunk in a carpet of leaves under tall trees. Focus stack of 33 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Famberhorst: , please, check the contour of the little water layer below the fungus. There is a cloning effect on its right-hand side end. --Harlock81 (talk) 07:09, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Done @Harlock81: If I understand the place correctly, the error has been corrected. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:39, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, it was there.
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, it was there.
Support --Cart (talk) 11:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting photo subject. Thanks for the retouching! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Another good focus stack Cmao20 (talk) 12:21, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:26, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:24, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 18:23, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2025 at 01:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
Info created by Adolphe Jean-Baptiste Bayot after Carl Nebel, restored, uploaded, ans nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice view of the Zócalo with the Cathedral. – Aristeas (talk) 20:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:25, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 11:24:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden
Info The roofed section with shop signs of Fredsgatan, a prestigious shopping street in Gothenburg, Sweden. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 11:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 11:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry for the perspective at first sight. ~Moheen (keep talking) 13:03, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Perspective is intentional for a dynamic impression. It is corrected based on the opening at the end of the arcade, which is horisontal and straight. Not all architecture photos need to follow the "FP church aisle perspective". --Cart (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but I agree with Moheen. It's directly visible. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Of course it's visible when it's intentional. If you don't like it, that's fine, but it's not something that accidentally happened to the photo or something I forgot to fix. The whole idea here is to play with the strong lines in the scene, treating it as something almost abstract. --Cart (talk) 16:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support It's a matter of taste. For me the dynamic impression is successful.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:21, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support It works also for me. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:24, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment
I wold clean CA, anoted. Picture is not so bad.--Mile (talk) 10:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC)Fixed Thanks for the tip! Talk about having a blind spot in your own photo. :) --Cart (talk) 11:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support The architectural arrangement and perspective lends a pleasing depth and draws the eye into the distance. In addition, the interplay of light and shadow adds dynamism to the scene and, for me personally, a sense of clarity and structure. The mentioned CA's are not prominently visible, but can be removed (especially on the Junkyard clothing store logo). -- Radomianin (talk) 10:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:06, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Let's see. Good aperture, quality fine, and something different. One out of "normal". --Mile (talk) 16:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:18, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Light is well handled but the content with commercial signs is uninteresting in my subjective view, sorry (no wow) and I don't like the angle of view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 14:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not quite per Basile: I like the angle of view and the subtle perspective correction, but I'm not a fan of the HDR look (lifted shadows, toned-down highlights, punchy colours). Difficult shot and interesting nomination, nonetheless -- Julesvernex2 (talk) 15:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2025 at 08:18:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:18, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:18, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Nice and appealing composition but not quite the quality you'd expect from a panorama. The structures and rocks work but the greenery looks very "Minecraft-y". --Cart (talk) 10:43, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support I think the green looks something like this in January.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose, too low-quality. The detail is lost at high magnification. JayCubby (talk) 23:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support weakish because the details at full size are not that good but I love the colours and the panoramic composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support per Cmao20 --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:12, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Beautiful colours and arrangement, but the light is a bit unfortunate, making the buildings look rather flat and overexposed, sorry. – Aristeas (talk) 20:04, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose CA's on trees on the right, and all buildings lack details. Sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Екатерина Борисова, unfortunately not enough details in my view. Sorry. --imehling (talk) 14:59, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 15:17:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
Info Beach crossing De Kerf in the Schoorl dunes. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:32, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:58, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Amazing landscape, but the image is too blurry, sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support It looks sharp to me, and don't forget it's 36 megapixels Cmao20 (talk) 12:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Yes, it could use a bit more sharpness and contrast, but it's also extremely beautiful. As lovely as beach dunes are, they are also tricky to work into a good compo, so well done for this. --Cart (talk) 14:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support very nice mood. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:16, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition and mood. In places like these dunes it’s often difficult to find a typical view which condenses the essence of the landscape in a single image; here this has been achieved. – Aristeas (talk) 19:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 13:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:46, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 07:17:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 07:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- imehling (talk) 07:17, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Unexceptional mountain image, in my view. Harsh shadows, hazy background and dull light. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment The landscape is awesome, but perhaps the photo would benefit from a little more light and a square crop? — Preceding unsigned comment added by W.carter (talk • contribs) 18:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Done Thanks. I've uploaded a new version. Maybe better now. --imehling (talk) 16:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks! For me this brings out the layers in the scene better and the trees sits more balanced in the composition. --Cart (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Dramatic and satisfying composition for me despite edge sharpness being only OK Cmao20 (talk) 12:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support For the new version.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive landscape in my eyes – with the distinctive trees on the steep rock and the rising clouds it reminds me of Chinese landscape paintings. – Aristeas (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Light is representative. The rising clouds in the background make it more interesting.--Milseburg (talk) 11:04, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:54, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2025 at 07:14:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created by Mahinur11 – uploaded by Mahinur11 – nominated by Kaim Amin -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kaim Amin (talk) 07:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Editing quality could be better, but it's striking, unusual motif that makes you happy to view. I also like that your nominations have good descriptions and categories, that makes it easier for users who are searching for specific photos to find these. --Cart (talk) 13:35, 25 March 2025 (UTC)Weak support
- I think it is oversaturated (see the woman's face). I would support with less saturation. Yann (talk) 19:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think you are right. Any chance of fixing this Kaim Amin? --Cart (talk) 11:16, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, I noticed the oversaturation too. I'll try to upload a fixed image. Kaim (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose until it is fixed. Yann (talk) 11:23, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, I noticed the oversaturation too. I'll try to upload a fixed image. Kaim (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think you are right. Any chance of fixing this Kaim Amin? --Cart (talk) 11:16, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- {
{--Ermell (talk) 23:17, 26 March 2025 (UTC)Support
Support Somehow. Crop could be better, to put her head on up-left third, or , to remove sand border on both sides - crop or strecth size. --Mile (talk) 16:59, 27 March 2025 (UTC) p.S. Here, i would try this option too. @Kaim Amin
Weak support Per Cart --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose in its current form. Mile's crop is definitely superior, and the saturation as pointed by Yann has also not been fixed. A renaming is also required for a more descriptive title. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:24, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Too many issues as such, would support if all fixes are implemented. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:26, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment Interesting but could be improved, per above -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Alternative version (Saturation edited, cropped)
Support, As suggested above, I edited it a bit and cropped on either side. pinging Basile Morin, Ermell, JukoFF, MZaplotnik, PetarM, Shagil Kannur, UnpetitproleX, W.carter, Yann -- Kaim (talk) 22:50, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging again, Basile Morin, Ermell, JukoFF, MZaplotnik -- Kaim (talk) 13:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Thank you, this is better. I've striked my vote above and moved it down here. For some reason I didn't get any 'ping' (I just came to have a look anyway) so let's hope it worked for the rest of the voters. Sometimes group pings to more than 5 users doesn't work here on Commons. If the others don't show up, you might have to make some new 'pings' in smaller groups. --Cart (talk) 23:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. I pinged everyone again, not sure if it worked. Kaim (talk) 12:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Well Kaim Amin, the pings definitely didn't work this time. You can't use the same time stamp and just add people to it. A ping only works if you mention the person and sign it with a new time stamp in the same edit. This is a safeguard in the system to not having people pinged as soon as someone else edit a section. I have this page on my watchlist and that's why I saw this. --Cart (talk) 13:16, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, okay :) how about now? such a hassle actually. Kaim (talk) 13:25, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Nope, I didn't get any ping. Hope some of the others got through. And yes it is a hassle but I didn't design the system, I'm only trying to help you make this a successful nomination. --Cart (talk) 13:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- @W.carter, Nah it's okay. Thank you for helping. Kaim (talk) 13:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Nope, I didn't get any ping. Hope some of the others got through. And yes it is a hassle but I didn't design the system, I'm only trying to help you make this a successful nomination. --Cart (talk) 13:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oh, okay :) how about now? such a hassle actually. Kaim (talk) 13:25, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Well Kaim Amin, the pings definitely didn't work this time. You can't use the same time stamp and just add people to it. A ping only works if you mention the person and sign it with a new time stamp in the same edit. This is a safeguard in the system to not having people pinged as soon as someone else edit a section. I have this page on my watchlist and that's why I saw this. --Cart (talk) 13:16, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. I pinged everyone again, not sure if it worked. Kaim (talk) 12:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Very good improvement, many thanks for the alternative version. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:00, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment Dont see much improvement. 1st put her face on up-left third, and borders of sand on right side. Crop should be more approproate. --Mile (talk) 18:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral to this version, leaning support, the saturation still looks a bit unnatural to me; Yann's version here (this image) looks less odd imo. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:16, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Also, the ping did not work for me either. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:17, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice angle of view, interesting craft work. (Note I did not received the ping above) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the improvements. The person (and all three-dimensionality) gets almost lost in the colourful ornaments of the handmade fans, giving the photo a striking psychedelic touch. – Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Better.(Note I did not received the ping above as well) --Ermell (talk) 06:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2025 at 13:10:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
Info No FPs of this place. Just great light and satisfying composition. created by I.Mahesh – uploaded by I.Mahesh – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment It's really great that you keep finding photos from new places and new photographers, but in doing so, would you please see to it that the photos are accompanied with good descriptions and categorizations. This nomination is to the 'Boats' gallery without any mention of the boats on the file page. Please remember that (per the rules) documentation is just as important for an FP as the photo. I'm asking you kindly. --Cart (talk) 13:29, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you I.Mahesh for fixing this! :-) --Cart (talk) 15:05, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think I do generally do this, but yes, sure, you’re right Cmao20 (talk) 16:41, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you I.Mahesh for fixing this! :-) --Cart (talk) 15:05, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:59, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice distribution of the various objects in the photo for me. --Famberhorst (talk) 06:31, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Fri 28 Mar → Wed 02 Apr Sat 29 Mar → Thu 03 Apr Sun 30 Mar → Fri 04 Apr Mon 31 Mar → Sat 05 Apr Tue 01 Apr → Sun 06 Apr Wed 02 Apr → Mon 07 Apr
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Mon 24 Mar → Wed 02 Apr Tue 25 Mar → Thu 03 Apr Wed 26 Mar → Fri 04 Apr Thu 27 Mar → Sat 05 Apr Fri 28 Mar → Sun 06 Apr Sat 29 Mar → Mon 07 Apr Sun 30 Mar → Tue 08 Apr Mon 31 Mar → Wed 09 Apr Tue 01 Apr → Thu 10 Apr Wed 02 Apr → Fri 11 Apr
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/April 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/April 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/April 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.