This help desk is a forum for questions and help on:
How to use Commons
Anyone, from newbie to experienced, can ask a question here. Questions will be replied to here as well. Any answers you receive are not legal advice and the responder cannot be held liable for them.
Resolved sections (marked by {{section resolved|1=~~~~}}) will be archived after two days. Sections with no discussion will be archived after ten days. The latest archive is Commons:Help desk/Archive/2025/03.
Right, people may use it if they really want, although it has difficult clauses. Like other version 1.0 CC licenses, it includes a warranty (good for the reusers, potentially dangerous for the licensor) and it does not allow the upgrade of derivatives to other licenses. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:44, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes the circle thing. I don't want to make a mistake and would prefer you do it. Is that ok? If not, Ill try and try not to break anything! MaskedSinger (talk) 09:09, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are many pictures of Stolpersteine already here in Commons, e. g.: Category:Stolpersteine in Stuttgart-Mitte. I took pictures of three more such stones. But I am hesitating to upload them because when I use the upload wizard, I am asked "Is this entirely your own work?". I think the correct answer is "This work contains the work of others", because the stones were made by Gunter Demnig.
Since I don't know, whether Mr. Demnig has a copyright protection, the wizard says: Do not upload.
But there are alreay so many pictures of Stolpersteine here.
What is the correct approach? Tdiet (talk) 21:36, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If the stones are in Germany COM:FOP Germany indicates that if they are in public and permanent then they can be used. {{FoP-Germany}} should be placed on the file page. Also US copyright needs to be considered, but that is beyond my abilities.
The Upload Wizard option "Yes, this work is not protected by copright law" could be used and you can add "{{FoP-Germany}}" at the next step in the "Any other information you want to add" while mentioning it is Demnig's work.
Photos in other countries may need a different evaluation.
Perhaps every file in the category should get tagged if they feature an artwork.
Agree. The Stolpersteine are usually paving stone-formed and have simple text (usually name, where they were deported, date of birth, date of death if murdered, etc.). --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:31, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Somethings go wrong with this subject, because there are two artists with this namen one born 1735 en the other born in 1852. Recently someone changed the name of some of the categories concerning these to painters.
See here. All the media files ended up in the main categorie: Domenico De Angelis. Containing works from both artist.
To add more to the confusion is that there is also this already existing Category:Domenico De Angelis (19th-century painter).
The recently chosen name for the category for the artist born in 1852 is: Category:Domenico De Angelis (Italo-Brazilian painter). I have some doubts if this is correct because i believe that the artist is born in Italy and did also work in Brasil but i can't find a source that made clear he permanently lived there or gained the Brasilian nationality.
I don't feel confidant about my skills here in commons to try to clean-up this category structure so i hope someone can help me with this.
Hi, I just took the definition from Wikidata, if this is incorrect you shoudl fix Wikidata first. Secondly, in Category:Domenico De Angelis we can just put a note for the other category. I think (19th-century painter) and (Italo-Brazilian painter) are just the same person, we should merge them. --Sailko (talk) 18:42, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Sailko: Wikidata has distinct Domenico De Angelis (Q18663487) and Domenico De Angelis (Q15943290); I agree with you on the latter conflation, and that person is certainly Q15943290; [2] at least vouches for Brazilian nationality, but could be wrong; is there anything more you would need to fix this?
Additional remark: [3] (Getty) gives both Italian and Brazilian nationality but says Italian is "preferred." I'd say that even at best, that is enough of a quagmire that it shouldn't be part of a category name. - Jmabel ! talk23:13, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Tagging @Sailko Thank you for your responses. I don't know how to fix assigning the correct category to media files after changes its name. Like i mentioned. This file now has the wrong painter assigned, and there are more examples. They were originally assigned to category:Domenico De Angelis (artist).
Second problem is that there are now two categories for Domenico De Angelis from 1852-1904. (19th-century painter) and (Italo-Brazilian painter). I think that should be just one. The correct name i do not have a specific preference and i do not no what the standard is here on commons. Personally i would go on the safe side and just use year of birth and year of death for both painters. --Geerestein3 (talk) 10:53, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Geerestein3: Since it sounds like you are out of your depth, I'll set up the categories and Wikidata. However, since you know the subject matter, could you please make sure in the end that everything ends up in the appropriate categories? Thanks. - Jmabel ! talk23:22, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We haven't heard from Jarekt or Sailko, but this doesn't seem likely to be very controversial, and I'm just going to go ahead and do it. - Jmabel ! talk19:09, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Jmabel I do not fully agree, as he died in 1804, which is already 19th century! It may make some confusion. Neoclassical was more clear to me, as his are is definitely Neoclassical --Sailko (talk) 15:24, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can tell, every piece we have from him is 18th-century, though it is possible that there is later work we do not have, or that something undated that we have could be later. - Jmabel ! talk02:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I want to create a stock image section on my extisting website. Can I upload images which I downloaded from Wikimedia Commons to my website? I will obey the licensure rules and will refer to the authors of each image. Also the license information will be shared with my users. Miroslavakya (talk) 10:34, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Wassim helal1: Bonjour, Je vois que vous avez déjà importer plusieurs photos. Vous savez donc comment faire. Mais il nous faut l'autorisation du photographe. Voyez COM:VRT/fr pour la procédure. Merci de ne pas recréer de fichiers déjà supprimés. Yann (talk) 23:16, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Two images of "Problem (Symposion)" by Akseli Gallén-Kallela
These two images are of the exact same painting by Akseli Gallén-Kallela and even their contents are pretty much identical. The latter is at a much better resolution than the former.
Do we need the first images at all, seeing that both images are in Commons and thus usable in all Wikimedia projects? If we don't, should all pages that use the first image be changed to use the second one and the first image then be deleted? JIP (talk) 00:13, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@JIP: I'm guessing that all visual differences are just artifacts in the first one, so I'd say the answer is yes; if you are going to take this on, do be careful to merge all information before making the first one a redirect, because there appears to be some information on the first file page that is missing from the second. - Jmabel ! talk00:56, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pero en todo caso, no hay un "editor", a menos que refieras a la Fundación Wikimedia. Los proyectos de Wikimedia son colaboraciones. Hay contribuyentes y administradores, pero no hay un editor individual.
Veo que todos sus preguntas (aquí, en es-wiki, en meta-wiki) son muy imprecisas. Por favor, ¿qué exactamente quieres hacer? Quizás podamos ayudarte, pero no sín saber tus intenciones. - Jmabel ! talk01:07, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Anatole-berthe: Perhaps. In Spanish "editor" mainly means publisher, not editing software. But look at the user's contributions on the various wikis: there is a pattern of very vague questions. - Jmabel ! talk01:45, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Undeletion should be requested at COM:UNDEL. Help Desk is not ideally the nice place to ask for this. Only admins have ability to view deleted revisions of files. signed, Aafi (talk)00:08, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo. Ich habe ein Foto eines Objekts gemacht, das in der WikiDaheim-Liste kein Bild hat. Wie kann es zugeordnet werden? Es wurde mittels Asistenten hochgeladen, Beschreibung und Koordinaten wurden vergeben. Der Upload ist eine Woche her, in der Liste ist der Platz noch immer leer. Kein Bild. Kann, oder muss es manuell zugeordnet werden, oder dauert es einfach nur etwas länger? Andere Bilder, die ich in den letzten Jahren gemacht und hochgeladen habe sind richtig zugeordnet. Viktor ip (talk) 13:48, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wenn du diese Seite nicht kennst, wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht helfen können?
Ich hätte auch gerne einen Screenshot gepostet, aber der Name "Screenshot" war zu bedeutungslos.
Auf dieser Seite sind Bilder, die Objekte zeigen. Für manche Objekte fehlen Bilder, die würde ich gerne anfertigen, hochladen - und somit meinen Beitrag leisten, damit jeder schöne Fotos von schönen Orten sehen kann. Viktor ip (talk) 17:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Viktor ip: erstmal danke für das Bild. WikiDaheim funktioniert in dem von dir angesprochenen Aspekt wie folgt:
eigenes Foto hochladen (WikiDaheim ist die App, die anzeigt, wo welche Bilder fehlen - dies sind Vorschläge und enzyklopädische Bilder zu Österreich sind auch davon abgesehen willkommen). Damit nimmt das Foto auch am Wettbewerb teil.
Foto einbinden an den Stellen, wo es fehlt, wo WikiDaheim es als fehlend betrachtet. Ich habe das eben bei Public library Ottensheim (Q56238285) gemacht. Aber WikiDaheim ist auch ein Wettbewerb um neue Menschen für die WP zu gewinnen, sie zum Mitmachen zu motivieren. Alle rundherum freuen sich also, wenn du passende Bilder an passenden Stellen einbaust (das sind diverse Listen, Artikel mit Bilderwünschen oder eben Wikidata-Einträge, jeweils aus der App entsprechend verlinkt).
ist das Foto eingebunden, wird es von WikiDaheim mit einer Verzögerung von rund einem Tag auch in der App angezeigt.
Hallo. Danke für diese Erklärung. Können wir das schrittweise nochmal durchgehen?
1) Foto hochladen. Das habe ich ganz sicher hinbekommen. Es ist definitiv da.
2) Einbinden. Du hast das eben gemacht? Wo und wie? Das war meine Frage! Kannst du das bitte detailierter beschreiben?
Dazu findet man nämlich keine Anleitung, kein Tutorial, keine Info...
3) Etwa einen Tag Verzögerung. Du hast es am 26. eingebunden, Heute ist der 28. Es ist weiterhin leer...
Aber ich prüfe das gerne morgen nochmal. Es ist auch nicht eilig, ich hätte nur gerne Gewissheit.
Wieso funktioniert das Einbinden nicht automatisch, wenn ich bereits beim entsprechenden leeren Bild auf das "Plus"-Symbol drücke, um etwas hochzuladen?
Wenn eine Sache von der Community lebt, dann muss sie einfach, und für jeden verständlich sein, nur so bleibt die Motivation aufrecht. Niemand möchte Bilder hochladen, wenn man dann wochenlang nach Antworten und Lösungen suchend verzweifelt. Viktor ip (talk) 06:29, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for pinging, @Viktor ip: if you could ping me, this will call my attention.
den 1. Punkt habe ich nur der Vollständigkeit halber erwähnt.
das Foto ist inzwischen da.
Screenshot Ich habe dir einen Screenshot gemacht und die Beschreibung des Vorgangs in der Bildbeschreibung eingefügt. Hilft das?
Wir haben die Quelldatenmenge (Anzahl der beachteten Einträge) mit 2025 wesentlich erweitert. Das Backend ist permanent am crawlen, und wenn es mit einem Auslesen fertig ist, fängt es wieder von vorne an. Dabei werden inzwischen neu eingefügte Bilder bemerkt. Kann sein, dass das inzwischen auch mal länger als einen Tag dauert.
ok danke, das ist wieder ein kleiner Schritt. Wenn ich nun auf "Wikidata" oder "zum Eintrag" klicke, komme ich zu meinem Bild. Aber es wird nach wie vor nicht angezeigt. In deinem Screenshot wird es angezeigt? Wird es bei dir angezeigt, wie es sein soll? Bei mir ist da ein leeres, hellblaues Kästchen. Wenn ich ein leeres Kästchen sehe, komme ich als 0815-User nicht auf die Idee, Links darunter anzuklicken. So soll es wohl auch nicht sein. Es sollte das Bild angezeigt werden.
Deine Beschreibung erklärt mir jetzt, wie ich ein Bild sehe, das da ist, aber nicht angezeigt wird.
Es ist unter "image", gleich unter "instance of"
Wenn ich zum Vergleich ein anderes Objekt nehme, wo ebenfalls kein Bild angezeigt wird, und dort auf "Wikidata" klicke, dann komme ich zu einer Seite wo es kein Bild gibt, und unter "instance of" folgt "country". Es gibt kein "image". Wo lade ich dann hoch? Viktor ip (talk) 18:58, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Viktor ip: dein Ping hat mich nicht erreicht, Syntaxfehler. Verwende bitte {{Ping|Herzi Pinki}}.
Bei mir wird das Bild in der app angezeigt. So wie im Screenshot zu sehen. Habe jetzt noch auf meinem Android probiert, da ist dasselbe. Was hast du für einen Browser? Versuche mal den Cache zu leeren. https://wikidaheim.at/Q683160 Die Bilder in der Anzeige links werden mit lazy loading beim Scrollen nachgeladen, im ersten Moment ist da eine dem Typ entsprechend eingefärbte Fläche, wird bei mir für kürzer als 1 sec. angezeigt. Hast du irgendwelche adblocker / uMatrix / NoScript aktiviert? Kannst du die Javascript-Console auf Fehlermeldungen prüfen? Mir fehlt ein bisschen die Fantasie. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:27, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wenn du in der App auf fehlende Bilder filterst, und der Eintrag für die Bibliothek dadurch verschwindet, dann wäre daran zu erkennen, dass der Grund bei der Anzeige des Bildes zu suchen ist, nicht beim Vorhandensein des Bildes. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 15:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
butterfly in Category:Burara amara
There's basically two alternative name combinations for the same type of butterfly. Hence two different wikidata.
trying to connected it to wikidata. I thought it was just annotation in the relevant wikidata, i.e. Multilingual sites /commonswikiCategory:Burara amara
with link in the category //-Wikidata Infobox-//
BUT, it still links to the wrong "older Bibasis amara", i.e Q4998125 and i dont see why!
The President of El Salvador posted a video of deportations[4]. Would a screenshot of it count as "fair use" for historical value?
The Presidential Press Office has also released some photos. I think I can only access them 2nd hand like from this AP article.[5] Would that count as either free use or fair use?
Fair use is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons, see COM:L. Non-free images and videos may be uploaded locally to English Wikipedia if it follows the guidelines, the photos from El Salvador's government are not free use since they don't automatically put government works in the public domain and if there isn't an explicit free license, then the works are presumed to be non-free. Abzeronow (talk) 23:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I want to place the image logo in accordance with the Copyright, how can I do it? I don't have a license but I want to download this file because there is no Azerbaijani poster for the 2025 Eurovision Song Contest, please help me, thank you
@Wernain Samuel: Bonjour, Vous pouvez faire ce type de remplacement d'un seul coup avec un outil comme par exemple celui-ci. (Le compte «Wernain S.~commonswiki» ne semble avoir qu'une cinquantaire de téléversements. Vous pouvez aussi les modifier un par un tranquillement si vous préférez.) Vous pouvez choisir d'insérer un lien vers une page de votre choix, par exemple Wernain Samuel sur Commons ou Wernain Samuel sur fr.wikipedia (quoique la pertinence de lier spécifiquement vers la section «Petites contributions» ne semble pas évidente). En principe, vous devriez faire ces modifications en utilisant votre compte «Wernain S.~commonswiki», pour qu'il soit clair que ces modifications d'attribution d'auteur sont bien faites par la même personne qui avait téléversé les fichiers. Quoique ce ne serait probablement pas bien grave de les faire en utilisant votre compte «Wernain Samuel», si l'identité est vérifiable par ailleurs ou si vous fusionnez les comptes. Mais avant tout, peut-être pourriez-vous décider si vous souhaitez conserver vos deux comptes distincts ou si vous préféreriez demander aux administrateurs de les fusionner en un seul compte. Il est permis d'avoir plusieurs comptes sur Commons, si vous souhaitez conserver vos deux comptes distincts, ce n'est pas un problème. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:01, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I have been granted permission by the band whose page I am updating to upload their single/ album sleeves. I have the written consent. Do I need to send it somewhere?… any help appreciated. Don’t want to get in trouble with anyone! Thanks Holeinthelegparttwo (talk) 17:16, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@TruthBendicoot: if I understand correctly from https://berlin.museum-digital.de/object/140197, the photo is by Ludwig Levy-Lenz (though possibly just published by him, with the photographer unknown; Levy-Lenz was a doctor at the institute). If the photo is by Levy-Lenz, who died in 1966, it would be copyrighted in Germany through 2036, so we can't use it. If we can't sort out who photographed it or just when it is taken, that's worse, because we'd have to allow 120 years from the latest possible date (1933 + 120 = 2053, so it could be used in 2054). In both cases, it would presumably be PD in the U.S. before it would in Germany (95 years after publication) so once it it is PD in Germany we could use it.
It's quite possible that authorship and publication info could be tracked down. If it was published before 1930 it would already be OK in the U.S.; if the author died in 1954 or earlier (and, sadly, quite a few of the people involved with the Institute were killed in the camps), it would be PD in Germany. Both of those dates move year by year. - Jmabel ! talk00:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If the image is unused (not used on any wikis), am I allowed to place it on any Wikipedia page if I searched it up here, or do I have to obtain permission from the author? Justjourney (talk) 03:06, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Justjourney: From Commons point of view, there is no problem with any file on Commons being used in any language Wikipedia. Of course, that is no guarantee that the active editors on Wikipedia will want a particular image on a particular page. - Jmabel ! talk03:59, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again, I see no relevance to Wikimedia Commons (this site). Is there something on Commons that you need help with? Otherwise, you are asking on the wrong page. - Jmabel ! talk05:21, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any quick way to delete all of the pornographic images uploaded by User:Degenbenis11? They were used in vandalism on the English Wikipedia and I think they are being used to against the wishes of the photo's subject, to embarrass them. I see no positive use for these files on the Commons but I don't know how to nominate multiple images. Thanks for any help you can provide. Liz (talk) 00:41, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded a photo of Dr. Haileyesus Getahun and photo is not visible on his bio. It was visible but when I checked now it is not avaialable. What can i do to get this photo up on the profile?
At one point I saw where I was able to add a tag either on your site or on my computer. Now, I don’t see tagging. Must it be a tag or can it “Wiki loves folklore 2025” also be a caption? Thank you! Globugs (talk) 11:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: I get the message randomly and every time I look at my contributions. The popups gadget and Ajax quick delete aren't working for me. I sort books here, and sometimes I see blank book cover jpgs and some random jpg files of a few loose pages from books that should be deleted. Popups might allow me to see author info for books in my searches of the archive.org uncategorized books. Everything's working on Wikipedia. Geoffroi18:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What are the current requirements for uploading photos under the following condition?
An amateur photographer friend has some beautiful nature photos, and I encouraged her to create an account and a gallery with her uploaded photos, and submit them to the monthly photo contests. She replied, to go ahead and upload a photo of my choices, she doesn't care about copyright or copyleft. Can I upload them with crediting her name as the photographer?— Ineuw talk12:49, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I believe it is necessary for her to pick a specific license and either follow the instructions at Commons:Consent, or, if she has an established social media account, write a public message there stating she agrees to release the pictures you upload under the license REAL💬⬆16:14, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still unclear on the guidelines for photos of a living person. Can I upload a photo of a college professor that I took myself? The photo was taken with their knowledge on campus. OxfordCommaNerd (talk) 15:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I tried uploading a bunch of photos using the Upload Wizard as usual, however after adding file names, captions and etc, approximately last 10 images of the same series did not get through at the upload process afterwards. I then clicked "retry failed upload" several times but it showed the same error message which I did not think much of so I clicked "continue" without them uploaded, in order to proceed to reupload those images again since the beginning. However upon reuploading these images fresh, they all returned error message "Could not store upload in the stash (UploadStashFileException): "An unknown error occurred in storage backend "local-swift-eqiad"."." for all files. I tried multiple times and on other browsers, but to the same result.
I then tried resend these images again from my iPhone (via Airdrop) to attempt the reupload, for these photos this time it says: Could not store upload in the stash (UploadStashFileException): "An unknown error occurred in storage backend "local-swift-codfw".". again, with multiple attempts leading to the same result.
Not just happening with UploadWizard - had some issues uploading earlier using the plain form, and having errors with Move+Replace such as
Error while moving the page. A detailed description of the error is shown below: API request failed (backend-fail-internal): An unknown error occurred in storage backend "local-swift-codfw". at Sun, 30 Mar 2025 02:20:05 GMTserved by mw-api-ext.eqiad.main-8674c8fcdf-r6bx9
Hi all, it seems it was a problem affecting all wikis in editing, and not just UploadWizard. I don't have much more details about it, except that it should be fixed by now. Sannita (WMF) (talk) 10:57, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I requested the rename for you. At the top of the file page, you should see a "More" dropdown menu, hovering it should reveal "Move" and other options REAL💬⬆16:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bloopityboop: If you are consistent about some aspect of them (e.g. attributing yourself as author, or indicating yourself consistently for attribution within a licensing template) you can use insource in the search, with an exact string. E.g. in my case, search on insource:"author=[[User:Jmabel|Joe Mabel]]". - Jmabel ! talk03:43, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Is it my fault and I really don't know what the problem is with Zendesk, or am I misunderstanding them? I have some more evidence to refer to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF)
Also, we don't have a user named Zendesk, and 施哲森's user page claims them to be native Russian-speaker with a professional knowledge of English, so writing here in Chinese seems rather bizarre. They have no significant contributions to Commons. This doesn't smell right. - Jmabel ! talk01:40, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I want to add a photo to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellsworth_Hunt_Augustus of the complex at Camp Beaumont that is named after him. A friend took, provided, and gave me permission to use the photo in that article. He stated:
"Not sure what Wikipedia will need, but this can be included:
This work is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"
I'm not well versed in such things, but I do not see an option that corresponds to this. Help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
OA17151104 (talk) 12:08, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ethgamero02: Almost certainly no. Almost all album artwork would be copyrighted and not free-licensed. I can't say anything definitive without a concrete example.
Hi, I need help with updating two Wikimedia pages that has outdated/old Logo of Tata Consultancy Services that is not in use currently. How do I update the new logo and correct logo of the company? Can someone please help?
Here's what I uploaded long ago:
"APPENDIX to the CONGRESSIONAL GLOBE
29th Congress 2nd Session
THE MEXICAN WAR
SPEECH OF MR. CORWIN
OF OHIO
In the Senate, February 11, 1847."
Wikissource has the much abridged version copied from Daniel Walker Howe's anthology, and I can find it easily.
But the above version, the original and unabridged 1847 version, which I posted years ago, I simply cannot find. Can anyone else?
-Bill Everdell
wreverdell@gmail.com WREverdell (talk) 14:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and welcome @Sumasa. I noticed you have successfully uploaded an image since you posted here, so did you manage to solve your upload problem? Tvpuppy (talk) 12:56, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Mikaylavance821: Hi, and welcome. That's when the copyrighted period for the whole site started. The review is dated February 13, 2002. You won't be able to upload here until the copyright expires. Without further info or following VRT, that will be about 2002+120+1=2123. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:08, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify further: when something says "Copyrighted 1995-2003" that is shorthand for "The material here was copyrighted at various times between 1995 and 2003." There are very few situations in which a copyright extends for anything less than 70 years from the copyright date and, as Jeff G. notes, 120 years is often a better rule of thumb when authorship is unclear. - Jmabel ! talk22:37, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
_-_Gösta_Serlachius_Fine_Arts_Foundation.jpg)
_logo.png){kind=link}
Done, as uploader is globally-locked. --Túrelio (talk) 09:26, 28 March 2025 (UTC).jpg#%7B%7Bint%3Afiledesc%7D%7D){kind=link}
_-_img_36.jpg){kind=link}
.svg/15px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png)
Comment, other users seems to have the same problem, as mentioned here: Commons:Village pump#API failures. Tvpuppy (talk) 02:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
