Fact-checking

In our article ‘Fact-checking and adding context‘ we looked at some of the traditional method for verifying information.

In the piece ‘Beyond fact-checking‘ we went beyond simple verification to applying critical thinking and contextual analysis to our fact-checking.

And in ‘Lateral reading for journalists‘ we looked at methods that have been used by journalist for many years but which have become easier and faster to apply thanks to the internet.

All the methods mentioned above are designed to help journalists weed out misinformation and disinformation in a bid to provide robust, accurate, and factual information.

Now we look at the SIFT method of fact-checking, research, and adding context, which has been developed by Mike Caulfield and is increasingly being used in journalism training and education.

SIFT teaches students how to critically evaluate information online through four steps: Stop, Investigate the source, Find better coverage, and Trace claims, quotes, and media back to the original context.

While it’s primarily aimed at combating misinformation in the digital age, it also offers computer-assisted benefits that can enhance traditional journalism practices. SIFT has been adopted in various educational settings, including media literacy courses and journalism programmes.

The SIFT method provides a straightforward process for evaluating online information. Its four distinct elements are:

• Stop:
  • This initial step emphasises pausing before engaging with any information. It encourages users to resist the urge to immediately share or believe something, and instead, to take a moment to reflect.
• Investigate the source:
  • This involves determining the credibility and background of the source of the information. It encourages journalists to apply “lateral reading,” which means looking at what other sources say about the original source.
• Find better coverage:
  • This step advises seeking out more reliable and trustworthy sources that provide better coverage of the claim or topic. It encourages journalists to look for consensus and expert analysis.
• Trace claims, quotes, and media to the original context:
  • This involves tracking down the original source of a claim, quote, or piece of media to understand its context.

Applying the four steps of the SIFT method leads to a more informed and accurate understanding of online information. Specifically, it aims to produce these key results:

• Increased accuracy:
  • By investigating sources and tracing claims, a journalist is less likely to be misled by false or misleading information.
• Improved source evaluation:
  • The journalist develops the ability to quickly and effectively assess the credibility and reliability of online sources.
• Enhanced contextual understanding:
  • Tracing claims to their original context enables the journalist to make sure that information is not being taken out of context and misrepresented.
• Reduced susceptibility to misinformation:
  • By being aware of emotional responses and actively seeking better coverage, the journalist become less vulnerable to manipulative content.
• Development of critical thinking skills:
  • SIFT fosters a habit of healthy skepticism and critical analysis, which are essential for journalists navigating the complex digital landscape.
• More responsible information sharing:
  • By verifying information before sharing it, the spread of misinformation is reduced.

In essence, the SIFT method is yet another form of fact-checking with an emphasis on speed. It provides a rapid fact-checking framework tailored for the digital age, prioritising quick evaluation of sources, content, emotional triggers, and cross-referencing against reliable information. Its value is amplified by the sheer volume and velocity of information being shared via user-generated content, social media, and algorithmic recommendations.

Related articles

Fact-checking and adding context

Beyond basic fact-checking

Lateral reading

Disinformation and misinformation

The post SIFT for fact-checking first appeared on Media Helping Media.

But what is lateral reading? How does it differ from normal reading? How should journalists apply it to their work? And what are the benefits?

Lateral reading existed long before computers and the internet. In the days of notebooks, pens, typewriters, and paper documents, journalists would have access to a stack of reference books sitting on dusty shelves in the newsroom, which they would consult when a story broke.

These would include well-thumbed encyclopaedias, copies of Who’s Who, and various dictionaries, English language style books, and journalism guide books.

There would also be the newspaper’s own archive of previous editions, see our article on keeping records.

If a journalist didn’t have the book they needed they would put their coat on and nip down to the local library to research information. They would also call any of the newspaper’s contacts who were knowledgeable about the issue being covered.

Of course not all stories required lateral reading. A news editor would often throw a journalist a news (press) release about a forthcoming event or other non-contentious news item and order them to “knock out 250 words on that”.

The journalists might put a call in to any contact mentioned in the news release, but often they would do as they were told and rework the content to keep the news editor happy. After all, they were merely looking for material to fill vacant space on a page. That is not lateral reading.

However, if a news editor wanted a topic to be investigated then the journalist would have to do their research. The order from the news editor would probably be along the lines of “have a dig around this and see what you come up with”. At that point lateral reading kicked in.

Now, in the age of computers and the internet, lateral reading is understood to mean navigating a wide variety of online information simultaneously in order to check-facts and learn more about a topic.

It involves opening multiple tabs in your web browser to investigate the credibility of a source, rather than just reading the information on a single page (which is called “vertical reading”).

When you read ‘vertically’, you stay on the same webpage and assess its credibility based on what you can see. This can be misleading, as biased or unreliable sources often present themselves as trustworthy.

How to apply lateral reading

There are many organisations that have developed courses where journalists can learn about how to apply lateral reading such as Civic Online Reasoning (COR), the News Literacy Project and the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL).

But you don’t need to attend a course in order to start applying lateral reading effectively when working online. Try these steps:

1. Open multiple tabs
   • When coming across a claim, an article, or a source, open multiple tabs to:
     • Investigate the website or organisation publishing the information.
     • Research the author or source of the claim.
     • Find other reliable sources covering the same topic.
2. Investigate the source
   • Before trusting information, research the source’s credibility:
     • Search for the organisation on Wikipedia or in news articles.
     • Check their “About” page for affiliations and biases.
     • Look for past credibility issues (fact-checking sites might flag it).
3. Cross-check information
   • Find other reliable sources reporting on the same issue:
     • Use fact-checking websites such as Snopes, PolitiFact, or Reuters Fact Check.
     • Look for government reports, academic sources, or expert commentary.
     • Be cautious if only partisan or obscure sites are reporting a claim.
4. Manipulative framing
   • Compare how different outlets report the same facts:
     • Look at how different sources describe the same event.
     • Consider whether images, headlines, or quotes are used selectively.
     • Be aware of emotionally charged language designed to sway opinion.
5. Social media and user-generated content
   • To fact-check viral claims:
     • Reverse search images to check their origin, using tools such as Google Images and TinEye.
     • Look for verification badges on social media accounts.
     • Check timestamps – an old photo might be falsely used for a current event.

Conclusion

Lateral reading is a skill journalists need to develop in order to help them in their research, fact-checking, and context-building. This in turn helps them maintain their commitment to accuracy and credibility. In an era where misinformation and disinformation can easily mislead audiences, lateral reading remains a powerful tool in the pursuit of truth and responsible reporting.

Related articles

Fact-checking and adding context

Beyond basic fact-checking

News sources and the ‘so what’ factor

The post Lateral reading first appeared on Media Helping Media.